Here are some problems to consider:
- Diversion of Treasury Funds:
Remember this?
At any time during his direct involvement with WL, did Sifu park treasury funds in his personal wallet? If yes, how much and for how long? And most importantly, why?? (Same for Abra but this isn’t the place for it). One estimate had the number around $400M of WL treasury funds sitting in his personal wallet around the time of the liquidation cascade.
$400M earn $135,000 per day in interest income (12%/yr. return). With Sifu’s knowledge, he could earn more than 12% per year. A more accurate estimate is around $400k PER DAY in interest income (36.5% annualized).
It would take approximately 125 days to accumulate $50M USD.
- Fiduciary Responsibilities:
Sifu was asked on Twitter how he accumulated $50M USD in a very short period, of which a substantial amount was now being sent to a washer in lots of 100 ETH. If you don’t remember, read this
Sifu’s response, also on Twitter, was something along the lines of “I did it through leveraged yield farming and leveraged directional bets”. Ok fine. But why, instead of simply withdrawing funds, did Sifu use a service mostly used by hackers, scammers, and drug dealers? Response, “privacy”.
While everyone is entitled to their privacy, those with direct access to a substantial amount of investor funds are obligated to be more transparent than most at the expense of their “privacy”. If that’s a problem, then you should not be responsible for the Treasury.
The treasurer of a HIGH-PROFILE DAO with SUBSTANTIAL TREASURY RESERVES should NOT behave in any way that could be construed as shady, even slightly. Just because WL is not registered as a fund or financial institution does not recuse those responsible for managing the Treasury from having fiduciary responsibilities. When investors put their money into a protocol, there are moral, legal, and ethical standards to abide by.
- PR Nightmare:
Bringing “back” Sifu will undoubtedly lead to countless articles, blog posts, twitter rants, etc… ridiculing a bipolar ecosystem of frogs who chose to bring back the person they ousted a short while ago, at a time when rebranding and reestablishing the credibility of WL is of paramount importance.
In fact, I would not be surprised if this proposal is the work of those who want WL to fail, wind down, and distribute the treasury to the wallets of the arbitrageurs. From a marketing/PR standpoint, this will have ZERO benefit and will likely prevent fund inflows to the treasury, practically assuring the failure of the DAO.
- Bring Sifu on as an Adviser.
If the community wishes to continue monetizing Sifu’s knowledge of DeFi, we need to bring him on as an adviser. I’m a big believer in redemption and a 2nd chance. I also know from firsthand experience, being in the wrong place at the wrong time can lead to unfair repercussions that indefinitely haunt a person.
That said, would you put a former Formula 1 driver in the seat of one of the fastest cars in the world and tell him “Don’t even think about going faster than 35 mph"?
After a year or two, we can reconsider appointing him as Treasurer.
I am not contesting Sifu’s value to WL. His talents would contribute to positive returns going forward. However, those talents are the product of experience in DeFi (i.e. replaceable). A brilliant engineer, hedge fund manager, Steve Jobs… these people are difficult if not impossible to replace. Knowledge that is the byproduct of experience is replaceable.