i read both the wonderland 2.0 proposal as well as the professor’s proposal. I like this one better.
1 Like
Lets go! And after we rebuilt Wonderland our next goal is the Royal Mint of Spain lol
Just kidding, I love the ideas proposed here. I am definitely willing to continue this awesome project.
Lets bring this to vote!
let’s together push forward Professor’s proposal
1 Like
I like The Professor thoughtful writing. +1 for me. Let’s move on to RFC pls.
1 Like
Read Professor’s latest article on rage quit option. He/she sounds reasonable and provides a win-win solution that both sides could agree on. Read and let’s put it for a vote.
Professor’s latest article on rage quit
I would disagree with a new coin and a new name…Yes sifugate is real…we rectified it…Getting newer names and coins will only confuse people…look at what happened when focus on TIME was shifted to wMEMO…lots of confusion…and then shifting of liquidity from TIME to wMEMO…shifting of LP from TJ to SUSHI…
These are all the sudden changes that creatted a flutter in the ranks and the whales ran thru the project.
So I request all of you, NO CHANGE TO THE WAY THINGS WERE…Let it run the way it was running…Deploy yhe treasury capital to earn returns…look for newer projects like Betswap and liquid staking…Make betswap and liquid staking work (WL receives revenue)…
And just like they say in the madagascar movie…just smile and wave boys…Just Mint and Stake Frogs…
This is the real situation…Hard but true
Another NEW CURRENCY…WTF…we scrambled when we shifted from TIME to wMEMO…now another coin and that will be the end of WL…please stop pivoting so much
1 Like
I like the proposal but have two suggestions
- The proposal suggests 20% of revenue to be shared. I think 50% should be shared. A lot of people have lost money. Sharing a higher % for now will instil confidence in investors. It can be reduced to 20% later if community votes for it.
- No buybacks as it drains the treasury of valuable funds
1 Like
Currently the earning of WL is less than 3% per month…So if your share of treasury is $10,000 then at 100% payout you would receive less than $300
To have a current treasury share of $10,000…assuming you are 60% down, you would have had to invest $25,000 initially…
So net net, it’s like getting say $250 odd for an investment of 25K…are you happy with profit sharing?
Would you rather have the money remain in WL where it might grow faster than the current RoI and thus giving you an overall better returns in a year or 2
Am I making any sense…
That makes sense.
What do you think about buybacks. People who sell wMEMO, those tokens should be redistributed to longterm holders and that would increase their share of the treasury?
Where do you find the information of 3% per month? can you share the web link?
Just a background check and have Dani know his real identity. The rest of us do not need to know. People should be protected from threats if things go pair shaped.
This is my first choice of the proposals but there NEEDS TO BE a backdated snapshot for the Rage Quit. We should not allow the whales to take advantage like that. Or be able to buy back in below backing like the people who bought before all the fud.
this is the best proposal I have seen by far - when do we vote on it?
Agree with everything in this proposal except the rage quit.
1 Like
Excellent proposal. Pragmatic and thoughtful — well laid out with your behind-the-scenes thinking. We need you together with Dani transforming Wonderland. There is much potential to be harnessed with Wonderland but it will only be cultivated and realized with the right leadership.
NB: My background is M&A operations integration and transformation strategy. I’d love to be part of the Wonderland 2.0 team. I’m a self-retired full-time investor so I would have plenty of time to focus on Wonderland operations. Please reach out if you’d like to collaborate. Here’s my LinkedIn: Noura Panaritis and my Medium: Noura - Medium
If you can read my actual answer on Medium is not something sudden which I strongly oppose is to much fucking about
I’m concerned that the people will vote this nonsense without understanding what’s all about.
In actual conditions if treasury making about 1 million a day we having 30 millions splited between al most 500k now according to the Professor 20%of this would be like 12 dollars.The question is who is going to benefit from this? Like 0.1%.mean the profit share will be distributed according to Wmemo everyone holds . According to this calculation is like pennies.
Is just not on .They cannot scrap the APY keep it for 1 year compounding interest then yes if price raise you burn enough Time and Wmemo supply and keep both give choice.
APY is high risk high rewards I agreed to and decided to take the market hit.
This is like risk free small dividend policy for big Hedge funds for filthy rich.
Now the professor wants to apply the same for the small crypto investor.
This is not on please share and strongly oppose this nonsense
Please consider my objections if I’m wrong please someone correct me and put me on the right path.
This is my answer and why I have strong objection towards this proposal.
1.Do not remove the Apy and rebases consider burning mechanisms instead and let the market take it’s natural course.
I agree if demonstrate better alternative numbers must speak before words
2. High APY is not particularly a marketing tool is your rewards by being an early adopter is a fairly compensation for your dose of risk you took.Is always your fair and diserved rewards.
Zhao didn’t said hey hight APY for Cake on Pancake Swap is bad let’s cut the APY because produce dilution aha…Cake started with 2 cents and I don’t have to tell you now how much 1 cake token is trade it for it breaking above 20 USD in average let’s say is trading at 10-12 USD ok and that was because of APY and rebases system ok?
I agree to take the risks you cannot implement this suddenly.
Professor doesn’t mention about burning mechanisms is this what we need.
Yes put the APY down gradually when supply is getting lower and price going up and we achieving stability.
According to the Professor 20% reparted between holders ok?
Treasury is making around 1 million a day roughly is about 30 millions divided between 500k holders 20%of it is 12 dollars each.But attention we hold different Wmemo amounts so it will be like pennies.
I tell you if in reality 90%vote no the same amount will pull out.
Yes the professor calculation would make sense if treasury passes beyond 100bn or so but seriously 
this is HEDGE fund model that works for filthy rich bastards this ain’t for crypto.
By the way what crypto Professor holds and trade?
An absolute no brainer hire the Professor
The Professor needs to be doxxed! Could be another Sifu Gate.
1 Like