If we keep it we need to lower it by a lot. I’m for both keeping the apy and abolishing it altogether. But if we keep it we need to lower it by a lot. And that could be slowly week by week until we are OK with it, but I think it needs to happen if we keep the apy. Yes it’s like most ppl say,just stocksplits but as long as you can withdraw memo to time to avax those stocksplits will keep selling pushing the price down.
What would you rather have? A very nice looking APY? Or the same APY without the number? Aren’t they the same?
I’d be against hiring this person although I do appreciate their insights of which many are good. However, he comes across rather smug in his writing and arrogance is the worst kind of ignorance to have because it’s incurable and leaves MAJOR blind spots in good judgement
Great article. I’m all in with the professor proposal
As long as the rage quit option remains a part of this proposal, I am okay with it. Prefer that we allow for the rage quit option before any other proposal still.
One of the better written words proposal I’ve read so far. He also makes some excellent points like scrabing Wmemo and moving to a singular token system. But if we are to go ahead with his proposal he needs to be doxxed and put his real name behind this. I believe the whole management team should be doxxed as this way it reduces the chance of another Sifu gate.
This is incredible. Love every word of this!
This is brilliant! Really convincing way forward. When do we get started?
1 Like
I like it !! Good proposition
Yes, 100% back the Professor’s ideas. Get him 3rd party doxxed and leth goo!
1 Like
I move that we proceed forward with the Professor’s recommended changes.
1 Like
Let’s vote on this. I am all for this proposal.
1 Like
This is by far the best plan moving forward. Indepth, clear direction, and exciting potential.
1 Like
I like this Professor proposal. However, would prefer rage quit before any proposal voting so proposals aren’t impacted by those wanting out. But if that doesn’t happen - I appreciate that this proposal (The Professor’s) has a rage quit option described. This proposal in general is more fleshed out than the wonderland 2.0 option. Would prefer to see this proposal go forward if it is between only this and the wonderland 2.0 option. The Wonderland 2.0 option seems very closed-minded, very rough, and aimed at silencing anyone who thinks differently via bans in the forums, and also creating a voting method that could result in bots creating thousands of address with very little TIME to manipulate votes. The Professor proposal is far better than the Wonderland 2.0 proposal.
Between the 2 proposals I like the prof better. Would like to know who the professor is. Maybe he/she could represent the community on the board?
2 Likes
The incredible professor / I support the professor’s suggestion
1 Like
No concerns about, DO IT!
1 Like
I think anyone vaguely familiar with DAOs was expecting the APY to drop over time (helping early investors). I’m fine with it dropping like it would have anyway as the treasury becomes healthy. Don’t just cut it to 0% in one go! PLEASE let APY drop gradually so that more frogs can recoup a portion of the 70% losses before moving forwards.
1 Like
I agree with this proposal but he/she should be dox!
- Can we get a breakdown of what will be the expected revenue sharing if we continue as it is? So that we have some realistic explanations.
- How much is the treasury making right now?
- How much a holder will get at 20% revenue share?
- The website doesn’t say how much the treasury is making in revenue at the moment?
2 Likes