Yes I agree am I voting right?
i agree, or letās do a full audit by an accredited company to restructure everything.
Price of time/memo almost at backing. Whoever wants to rage quit can go ahead and do so when the time comes. Buyback will be all thatās required.
This was already voted on and had a not. @admin stop all these mini votes to try pass it. You cant keep voting until you get what you want on the sly
1 Like
100% Agreed, right thing to do
No-one has been informed of that āvotationā. And considering the flash notice period is quite suspicious. The way is written definitely is not clear and it does not anyway reflect the wish to get our initial investment back. It doesnāt describe in details the process and the methods.
So the āwonderful super IQā team is asked to provide all the necessary information as:
transactions
date
addresses lists
amount purchased
etc.
so to make the calculation.
What remains in the treasury, or projects - you can play with your rage. As long as we get out investment back.
we are in Zug, btw. So we r not going to wait other weeks!
We have 1-PROPOSAL MONEY BACK OF OUR INITIAL INVESTMENS! WHICH IS VERY CLEAR!
your proposal ārage quitā: what does even mean? Can you please sum up a list with the most important benefits for us, and differences with the first proposal?? Am I having my initial investment back with your proposal?
thank you
1 Like
Thank you!
my suggestion: we can work in this platform - starting a new fresh topic page and engage a series of draft versions on the proposal argument we are discussing, which is to get our initial investment back.
Then we can post it on the snapshot thanks to Bholy777!
of course everybody can express their opinions promoting our proposal and adjusting our drafts versions.
2 Likes
But Iām afraid the moderator might deny it because thereās been similar discussion already. Besides, I had just come to realize that in order to get valid Snapshot voting, we need to go through WIP.
1 Like
definitely those transactions belongs to the blockchains and are visible to everybody.
The team should provide us the real entity of the treasury, because we have no access on that without doing a proper investigation on the cash out during liquidation. What I know there must be missing at least what it is described here:
āThe news of Dhanani sending millions to Tornado cash was spread on twitter shortly after the transactions posted.ā
"Dhanani split the 2,000 Eth in 100Eth transactions and sent 20 separate transactions to Tornado Cash.
The speculation is that Dhanani is laundering this money through Tornado Cash in order to make it untraceable. Once he withdraws it into different wallets, it would be very hard for anyone to claw back."
1 Like
The argument about requesting the initial investment back is an option of Rage Quit.
If moderator approve that this proposal have gain enough discussion and ready for a WIP, then I can help to draft and post the Snapshot voting proposal reasoning.
1 Like
Can you frame then a bit better, maybe in a list of results/benefits whatās in your proposal, and how (method) you are going to make it work?
Because if something good come out of this, we never know what it can be turned in. To be honest āfrogsā are not so evolved either. Happy to relax with some other exciting investments.
Thank you
1 Like
Glad to hear that you are relaxed with other investment.
I will draft it and post it here for you and everyone to view and discuss.
Thanks
1 Like
You did not read what I wrote at all.
Its about including a safe rage-quit since everyone is divided. Its an option to the already existing proposal.
Allow me to clarify;
There is a jar of cookies with 8 cookies. There are 30 kids who all want a cookie. Instead of splitting the cookies, the 30 kids work together to bake more cookies for everyone. Simple.
My proposal was NOT POLITICAL if you had actually read what I was saying
Read.
https://dao.wonderland.money/t/buy-20million-in-avax/
If we had done what I said we wouldāve made the treasury several million dollars more.
Are you referring to RAGE-quit? SO you advise to sell wMEMO and than we have to give a try to regain the losses with AVAX? 
You donāt describe at all how to āgenerateā these new cookies:
HOW
WHEN
WHO
Buying AVAX? So you are relying in a price increase at least at its ATH?
So this is using the same pool with the same āpeopleā that created the problem at the first place. This is a trust we donāt feel to give, sorry.
Explain better for the rest of us.
Because besides exchanging wMEMO with MIM, there are no other token available on the only exchange available. So we are stucked
1 Like
Do you realize there is still over $20million in MIM in the treasury? Zapper - Your Home to Web3
Then there are other stables in their like USDT and USDC
THAT is where we would allocate from. To increase the value of the treasury by providing addition yield that otherwise is āstableā. Again, look at avax now. If we had taken a break from the politics and used our treasury to generate more money, then people start to feel more secure about others leaving the project.
If Avax hits even $90, then if my proposal was actually paid attention to, then in that week that I had proposed this, we would have increased our yield on that investment by 27%. $20,000,000+27%= $25,400,000.
We would have generated another 5million in to the protocol that otherwise wouldnāt be there because our tokens are STABLE. Iām not talking about using ALL of our stable tokens, just 1/5 of the amount that Dani had sold FROM AVAX TO BEGIN WITH and reallocating it back in.
$5,400,000 in a week.
Now that sounds like a reasonable amount to start considering the rage-quit option more seriously.
But perhaps Iāll just shelf this for when all of this blows over.
The news spreading on tweeter is just news without solid proof. That should not be used as a reasoning logic to support the proposal.
Iām busy today, but will spend an hour to structure the proposal claim tonight. Thank you.
2 Likes
Donāt think we should resort to this socialist economy proposalā¦Crypto forever has been Capitalist. All you need is time to recover from the lows. Letās not resort to rage quit.
This proposal makes no sense, how would they track āoriginal investmentā, just ask people what their original investment was? They canāt tie wallets back to identitiesā¦
This whole proposal is stupid, makes no sense and is a terrible idea.
1 Like